RESUMO
Background: The health emergency caused by the SarS-Cov-2 pandemic has been strongly impacting on oncological patients’ (pts). The purpose of this study was to explore the emotional impact and perception of cancer pts who received the vaccine against COVID-19 at the University Hospital and Trust of Verona (Italy). Methods: After the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine an anonymously questionnaire was proposed to cancer pts (March-May 2021). The survey investigated anxiety and depression levels using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), psychological distress with the Distress Thermometer (DT). Additionally, four specific items regarding the awareness about: i) infection risks, ii) interference with chemotherapy treatment, and iii) adverse effects, were developed. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results: A total of 736 patients (mean age 63 yrs) completed the questionnaire. Breast (23%) and gastrointestinal (40%) were the most represented cancer sites. The majority of pts (65%) reported mild levels of distress (DT ≤4), while moderate (DT 5-7) and severe (DT ≥8) levels were identified in 26% and 9% of participants, respectively. A total of 11% and 8% of pts experienced clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS ≥11), whereas 15% were borderline (HADS score 8-10). Two thirds of pts (67%) thought that the vaccination may reduce the infection risks and 56% felt safer. Overall, 59% of pts did not believe that vaccine-related side effects may interfere with the oncological treatment and 49% considered the vaccination safe. Conclusions: Most cancer pts undergoing COVID-19 vaccination presented mild levels of anxiety, depression and distress. Oncological pts undergoing vaccination felt safe and judged the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination to overweight the potential side effects. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
RESUMO
Background: The health emergency caused by the SarS-Cov-2 pandemic has a strong impact on oncological patients' (pts) life. The purpose of this study is to explore the emotional impact and pts' perception experienced who accessed to our Oncology section at University Hospital and Trust of Verona (Italy) regarding these rules. Method(s): An questionnaire was designed by our Psycho-Oncology service and administered to all pts accessing to our outpatient facilities during a 21-days period (April 9th - April 30th, 2020). Two main areas were investigated: i) organizational aspects and ii) awareness about infection risks, protective strategies, and new rules adopted (14 items, plus demographic data). Percentage of relevant answers to questionnaire items are reported with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Result(s): Among 241 respondents, fear of accessing hospital facilities and that chemotherapy treatment could increase the infection risk was reported to be quite high or high in 34% (95% CI: 29-41%) and 27% (95% CI: 21-33%), respectively. Awareness of disease-related risks of infection and strategies to reduce them was "very clear" or "fairly clear" [83% (95% CI: 78-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), respectively]. Availability of medical personnel to be contacted while not in hospital was perceived as "very high". Almost all pts felt that organizational measures were clearly expressed (98%, 95% CI: 96-100%) and mainly obtained through the information received at the triage (73%, 95% CI: 67-79%). Overall acceptance of these measures was very high (>70%). Of note, the acceptance of phone-based follow-up and visits were perceived as "not very adequate" or "absolutely not adequate" by 17% (95% CI: 12-22 %) and 18% (95% CI: 13-23%) of respondents, respectively. Conclusion(s): Herein, we report among the first real-life experiences about oncological pts' perception of infection risks and their level of acceptance of protective measures during SarS-Cov-2 pandemic. A timely and thoughtful measures adoption, the coordinated efforts of all figures involved in cancer care and an effective communication strategy to share the necessary risks and sacrifices with pts/caregivers, can lead to effective protection of oncological pts. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2020
RESUMO
Background: COVID-19 pandemic has represented a historic challenge to healthcare systems. The management of cancer care has become a crucial issue for clinical services to cancer patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, raising evidence has been published on lung cancer care but no data have been presented on the integrated care pathways (ICP) impact. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the ICPs of consecutive lung cancer patients who accessed two Centres before and after COVID-19 pandemic: the Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV)/University Hospital of Padua and University Hospital of Verona. Sixteen indicators about oncology, radiaton therapy, thoracic surgery, pathology and pneumology were developed using groupfacilitation techniques taking into account their reproducibility, significance, measurability. We report data extracted from electronic medical records and linked softwares, about MDT performance at the two participating Centres, and preliminary data about pathological and oncological indicators in Padua. Additional data about both complete ICPs will be presented at the Conference. Results: We compared data about ICP performance in two window periods: 1/3/2019-30/4/2019 and 1/3/2020- 30/4/2020. MDT meetings were reshaped in order to discuss those cases where more than two specialists were required and whenever possible on a web-basis;therefore, it determined an average reduction of patients discussed of 57.5%. Preliminary data from Padua showed that median time between diagnostic procedure and diagnosis was reduced from 11 days in 2019 to 7.5 days in 2020, mostly due to a prioritization of oncological procedures over any other. Moreover, a 39% reduction of first oncological visits was observed between the two time frames;this was linked to a reduction of out of region second opinion and to optimization of outpatient access. Among patients under oncological treatment, 12(4%) and 8(2%) patients received treatment within 30 days from death in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Conclusions: Based on the experience the two Centres went through, we identified the key steps in ICP impacted by a pandemic such COVID-19 so to proactively put in place robust service provision in thoracic oncology.
RESUMO
Background: COVID-19 pandemic started in Italy with clusters identified in Northern Italy. Since the beginning, the Veneto region started a proactive approach, including testing for SARS-CoV-2 part of the asymptomatic population and healthcare providers. The Veneto Oncology Network ROV licensed a dedicated PDTA to ensure proper care minimizing the risk of infection in cancer patient (pts). At the same time, a regional registry (ROVID) has been set up, to describe epidemiology and clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer pts. Materials and methods: All pts with cancer diagnosis and documented SARS-CoV-2 infection are eligible. The following information are recorded: age, cancer diagnosis, stage, tumor biology, comorbidities, presence of COVID- 19 symptoms, anticancer treatment at the time infection (type, aim, line of therapy, discontinuation, recovery), other medical treatments, hospitalization, treatments for SARS-CoV-2 infection, fate of the infection. Results: 144 pts from 18 centers have been enrolled. Mean age at the time infection: 69 yrs (25 to 95 yrs). The 5 most common cancer types were breast cancer (n=26), colorectal, prostate, lung cancer (n=16 each), melanoma (n=10). Distribution by stage was as follows: I 19%, II 9%, III 13%, IV 59%. Lung metastases were documented in 15% of the cases. 77% of the pts had at least one comorbidity. COVID-19 symptoms were reported in 78% of the pts. Active anticancer therapy at the time of the infection was reported for 71 pts (chemotherapy n=37, targeted therapy n=14, hormonal therapy n=13, immunotherapy n=6). Treatment was discontinued because of infection in 44 case. 101 pts were hospitalized;45 received low flow oxygen support and 26 received non-invasive mechanical ventilation, high flow nasal cannula or endotracheal intubation. The fate of infection is available for 95 cases so far: 44 infection resolution with confirmed negative swab, 16 with clinical resolution discharged with positive swab, and 35 deaths. Among cases with fatal exitus, 22 were attributable to COVID-19. Conclusions: Data collection is still ongoing, including further follow up and results of serological tests, where available. The mortality rate reported in this study is in line with other registry of cancer patients, confirming the frailty of this population. These data reinforce the need to protect cancer patients from SARS-CoV2 infection.
RESUMO
Background: The treatment of high priority populations, including patients actively using intravenous drugs (active PWID), must be prioritized to accomplish the WHO HCV elimination goals by 2030. Simplification of the treatment cascade is key to reaching this goal, even more so in the COVID-19 era Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is a protease inhibitor-free, pangenotypic, panfibrotic, single duration, single tablet regimen, to be taken without regards to food and with limited drug-drug interactions This real-world analysis evaluates SOF/VEL as a simple strategy to implement a testand- treat approach in HCV-infected active PWID Methods: Adult active PWID treated for HCV with 12 weeks SOF/VEL in different clinical settings were included from 25 cohorts in 6 countries Patients with a history of decompensation or prior NS5A-inhibitor exposure were excluded The endpoints were HCV cure (undetectable HCV RNA ≥12 after the end of therapy, SVR12) and time-to-treatment (TT) between most recent HCV RNA measurement and SOF/VEL treatment start Results: Analysis included 340 patients, mean age 44±10years, 84% male, 15% compensated cirrhotic (CC) and 8% treatment-experienced, with 43% genotype (GT) 1 and 41% GT3 73% of patients were diagnosed with a mental disorder, 27% were homeless and 21% incarcerated Of patients with TT available (n=334), 10% were treated the same day of diagnosis, 16% within 1 week, 39% within 1 month, and 69% within 3 months Treatment adherence below 90% was observed in 24 patients (8%) SVR12 is available for 254 patients (75%), as non-virological or unknown cause of failure was documented in 86 patients (25%), 79% due to lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) SVR12 was 98% overall (249/254), 98% (80/82) in non-cirrhotic and 95% (20/21) in CC patients Active PWID with mental disorders showed 97% SVR12 (181/186) Of active PWID with GT3 infection, 96% (104/180) were cured, including 95% (20/21) of those with CC Of 31 patients starting treatment within 1 week of diagnosis, all achieved SVR12 compared to 126/129 (98%) starting within 3 months of diagnosis Conclusion: SOF/VEL is a simple HCV treatment resulting in high cure rates in active PWID, including patients with multiple complicating factors LTFU remains a challenge in this population The simplicity of the SOF/VEL approach allowing for shortening of the patient care cascade and rapid treatment starts with high cure rates may help address this important issue.
RESUMO
Background: Stigma and poor linkage to care, amplified in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, are significant barriers for treating hepatitis C (HCV) in vulnerable patients, reducing our ability to implement a rapid test and treat (TnT) strategy with minimal monitoring within a simple patient cascade, as currently available HCV therapies would allow us to do This real-world analysis evaluates our ability to implement this approach in both general (GP) and vulnerable (VP) populations Methods: HCV-infected patients from 32 clinical cohorts in 8 countries treated with sofosbuvir/ velpatasvir without a history of decompensation or prior NS5A-inhibitor exposure were included in this analysis The VP included prisoners, homeless patients and patients with mental disorders Time to treatment (TT) between the most recent HCV RNA measurement and treatment initiation was estimated based on available data Results: A total of 2449 patients were included, 937 in GP (58% males), 1512 (72% males) in VP (59% with mental disorders, 31% homeless, 10% imprisoned) Mean age [standard deviation] was 55 [14] and 50 [14] years in GP and VP respectively Genotype 3 was observed in 35% and 33% respectively, compensated cirrhosis confirmed in 20% and 18% of GP versus VP. The median TT [MTT, interquartile range] was 55 days [23- 107] in GP and 60 days [27-132] in VP The longest MTT of 66 days [32-134] was observed in patients with mental disorders MTT was 63 days [29-149] in prisoners and 27 days [13-71] among the homeless Only 13% of GP and 8% of VP were treated the same day of diagnosis, and 70% of GP and 63% of VP were treated within 3 months In patients with mental disorders only 4% were treated the same day of diagnosis Cure rates were high and consistent with previously reported cure rates Conclusion: MTT varies across HCV patient groups, from over 6 months to 1 day This analysis shows that a quick treatment start is possible, both in general population and in vulnerable populations, supporting the feasibility of a TnT approach in all populations New strategies should be considered to engage patients with mental disorders in this model of care more effectively.
RESUMO
Background: On February 23rd the first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed at the University Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy. On March 13th, the Oncology Section was converted into a 22 inpatient beds COVID unit and we had to reshape our organization and personnel to face the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, while maintaining our oncological activity. Methods: We tracked down oncological activity from January 1st to March 31st, 2020, in relationship to the organizational changes implemented and in comparison to the same period of 2019. We also recorded cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections observed in oncology health professionals and hospital admissions of active oncology patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: Progressive restrictions in patients', visitors', and caregivers' access to the inpatient and outpatient facilities of the Oncology section and organizational changes were adopted early on during the epidemic peak. Since March 13th, segregated personnel teams were created, one dedicated to the COVID unit and a "clean" one dedicated to oncological patients, resulting in an overall 40% and 43% reduction in oncology-dedicated medical and nursing/auxiliary staff, respectively. As compared with the same trimester in 2019, the overall reduction in total numbers of inpatient admissions, chemotherapy administrations, and specialty visits in the period January-March 2020 was 8%, 6%, and 3%, respectively;based on the weekly average of daily accesses, reduction in some of the oncological activities became statistically significant from week 11. Patient's acceptance of adopted measures was very high (see abstract by Tregnago D). Overall, 8/85 (9%) health professionals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (no hospital admissions and no treatment required) and 7/525 (1.3%) active oncology patients were admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection (of whom, 2 died of infection-related complications). Conclusions: A minimal (<10%) reduction in Oncology activity was registered during the peak of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Verona, Italy. Organizational and protective measures adopted appear to have contributed to keep infections in both health professionals and oncological patients to a minimum. Legal entity responsible for the study: University of Verona. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.